Two decades of digital photogrammetry: Revisiting Chandler’s 1999 paper on “Effective application of automated digital photogrammetry for geomorphological research” – a synthesis

D. Fawcett*, J. Blanco-Sacristán, P. Benaud

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Digital photogrammetry has experienced rapid development regarding the technology involved and its ease of use over the past two decades. We revisit the work of Jim Chandler who in 1999 published a technical communication seeking to familiarise novice users of photogrammetric methods with important theoretical concepts and practical considerations. In doing so, we assess considerations such as camera calibration and the need for photo-control and check points, as they apply to modern software and workflows, in particular for structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry. We also highlight the implications of lightweight drones being the new platform of choice for many photogrammetry-based studies in the geosciences. Finally, we present three examples based on our own work, showing the opportunities that SfM photogrammetry offers at different scales and systems: at the micro-scale for monitoring geomorphological change, and at the meso-scale for hydrological modelling and the reconstruction of vegetation canopies. Our examples showcase developments and applications of photogrammetry which go beyond what was considered feasible 20 years ago and indicate future directions that applications may take. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that, in-line with Chandler’s recommendations, the pre-calibration of consumer-grade cameras, instead of relying entirely on self-calibration by software, can yield palpable benefits in micro-scale applications and that measurements of sufficient control points are still central to generating reproducible, high-accuracy products. With the unprecedented ease of use and wide areas of application, scientists applying photogrammetric methods would do well to remember basic considerations and seek methods for the validation of generated products.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)299-312
    Number of pages14
    JournalProgress in Physical Geography
    Volume43
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

    Bibliographical note

    Funding Information:
    The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/ or publication of this article: D. Fawcett and J. Blanco-Sacristán received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No 721995. Work by P. Benaud was funded by and carried out under the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs project SP1311 ‘Piloting a cost-effective framework for monitoring soil erosion in England and Wales’.

    Funding Information:
    The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: D. Fawcett and J. Blanco-Sacrist?n received funding from the European Union?s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sk?odowska-Curie Grant Agreement No 721995. Work by P. Benaud was funded by and carried out under the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs project SP1311 `Piloting a cost-effective framework for monitoring soil erosion in England and Wales?.

    Publisher Copyright:
    © The Author(s) 2019.

    Keywords

    • drone
    • geomorphology
    • Photogrammetry
    • point clouds
    • SfM
    • UAV
    • vegetation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Geography, Planning and Development
    • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • General Earth and Planetary Sciences

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Two decades of digital photogrammetry: Revisiting Chandler’s 1999 paper on “Effective application of automated digital photogrammetry for geomorphological research” – a synthesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this