Thyroid Cytopathology Cancer Diagnosis from Smartphone Images Using Machine Learning

We examined the performance of deep learning models on the classification of thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies using microscope images captured in 2 ways: with a high-resolution scanner and with a mobile phone camera. Our training set consisted of images from 964 whole-slide images captured with a high-resolution scanner. Our test set consisted of 100 slides; 20 manually selected regions of interest (ROIs) from each slide were captured in 2 ways as mentioned above. Applying a baseline machine learning algorithm trained on scanner ROIs resulted in performance deterioration when applied to the smartphone ROIs (97.8% area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], CI = [95.4%, 100.0%] for scanner images vs 89.5% AUC, CI = [82.3%, 96.6%] for mobile images, P = .019). Preliminary analysis via histogram matching shows that the baseline model is overly sensitive to slight color variations in the images (specifically, to color differences between mobile and scanner images). Adding color augmentation during training reduces this sensitivity and narrows the performance gap between mobile and scanner images (97.6% AUC, CI = [95.0%, 100.0%] for scanner images vs 96.0% AUC, CI = [91.8%, 100.0%] for mobile images, P = .309), with both modalities on par with human pathologist performance (95.6% AUC, CI = [91.6%, 99.5%]) for malignancy prediction (P = .398 for pathologist vs scanner and P = .875 for pathologist vs mobile). For indeterminate cases (pathologist-assigned Bethesda category of 3, 4, or 5), color augmentations confer some improvement (88.3% AUC, CI = [73.7%, 100.0%] for the baseline model vs 96.2% AUC, CI = [90.9%, 100.0%] with color augmentations, P = .158). In addition, we found that our model’s performance levels off after 15 ROIs, a promising indication that ROI data collection would not be time-consuming for our diagnostic system. Finally, we showed that the model has sensible Bethesda category (TBS) predictions (increasing risk malignancy rate with predicted TBS category, with 0% malignancy for predicted TBS 2 and 100% malignancy for TBS 6).