TY - JOUR
T1 - The Potential of Multilayered Hierarchical Nonterrestrial Networks for 6G: A Comparative Analysis Among Networking Architectures
AU - Wang, Dengke
AU - Giordani, Marco
AU - Alouini, Mohamed-Slim
AU - Zorzi, Michele
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2021-07-16
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Research for 6th generation (6G) communication currently focuses on non terrestrial networks (NTNs) to promote ubiquitous and ultrahigh-capacity global connectivity. Specifically, multilayered hierarchical networks, i.e., the orchestration among different
aerial/space platforms, including low-altitude platforms (LAPs), high-altitude platforms (HAPs), and satellites cooperating at different altitudes, currently represent one of the most attractive technological options to solve coverage and latency constraints associated with the NTN paradigm. However, several issues still need to be resolved for proper network design. In this work, we evaluate the performance of different multilayered non terrestrial configurations. We also provide guidelines on the optimal working point(s) for
which it is possible to achieve a good compromise between improved system flexibility and network performance with respect to a baseline stand-alone deployment.
AB - Research for 6th generation (6G) communication currently focuses on non terrestrial networks (NTNs) to promote ubiquitous and ultrahigh-capacity global connectivity. Specifically, multilayered hierarchical networks, i.e., the orchestration among different
aerial/space platforms, including low-altitude platforms (LAPs), high-altitude platforms (HAPs), and satellites cooperating at different altitudes, currently represent one of the most attractive technological options to solve coverage and latency constraints associated with the NTN paradigm. However, several issues still need to be resolved for proper network design. In this work, we evaluate the performance of different multilayered non terrestrial configurations. We also provide guidelines on the optimal working point(s) for
which it is possible to achieve a good compromise between improved system flexibility and network performance with respect to a baseline stand-alone deployment.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/670232
UR - https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9484695/
U2 - 10.1109/MVT.2021.3085168
DO - 10.1109/MVT.2021.3085168
M3 - Article
SN - 1556-6080
JO - IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine
JF - IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine
ER -