We survey concepts at the frontier of research connecting artificial, animal, and human cognition to computation and information processing—from the Turing test to Searle’s Chinese room argument, from integrated information theory to computational and algorithmic complexity. We start by arguing that passing the Turing test is a trivial computational problem and that its pragmatic difficulty sheds light on the computational nature of the human mind more than it does on the challenge of artificial intelligence. We then review our proposed algorithmic information-theoretic measures for quantifying and characterizing cognition in various forms. These are capable of accounting for known biases in human behavior, thus vindicating a computational algorithmic view of cognition as first suggested by Turing, but this time rooted in the concept of algorithmic probability, which in turn is based on computational universality while being independent of computational model, and which has the virtue of being predictive and testable as a model theory of cognitive behavior.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Title of host publication||Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics|
|Publisher||Springer International Publishing|
|Number of pages||23|
|State||Published - 2017|
|Name||Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics|
Bibliographical notePublisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer International Publishing AG.
ASJC Scopus subject areas