The information-theoretic and algorithmic approach to human, animal, and artificial cognition

Nicolas Gauvrit*, Hector Zenil, Jesper Tegnér

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

We survey concepts at the frontier of research connecting artificial, animal, and human cognition to computation and information processing—from the Turing test to Searle’s Chinese room argument, from integrated information theory to computational and algorithmic complexity. We start by arguing that passing the Turing test is a trivial computational problem and that its pragmatic difficulty sheds light on the computational nature of the human mind more than it does on the challenge of artificial intelligence. We then review our proposed algorithmic information-theoretic measures for quantifying and characterizing cognition in various forms. These are capable of accounting for known biases in human behavior, thus vindicating a computational algorithmic view of cognition as first suggested by Turing, but this time rooted in the concept of algorithmic probability, which in turn is based on computational universality while being independent of computational model, and which has the virtue of being predictive and testable as a model theory of cognitive behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages117-139
Number of pages23
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Publication series

NameStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
Volume28
ISSN (Print)2192-6255
ISSN (Electronic)2192-6263

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer International Publishing AG.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The information-theoretic and algorithmic approach to human, animal, and artificial cognition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this