Subjective and objective evaluation of chest imaging systems

F. R. Verdun*, F. Bochud, C. Depeursinge, L. Desponds, M. Grecescu, C. Hessler, S. Raimondi, J. F. Valley

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


For a user facing the task of choosing a new radiological material, it is important to define a standard procedure to make comparisons. To do so there are two different philosophies. On the one hand, one can perform a subjective test using an anthropomorphic phantom, and on the other hand one can define an objective test to quantify the notion of quality. These two different techniques have been used to rank 23 screen-film combinations for chest imaging.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-94
Number of pages4
JournalRadiation Protection Dosimetry
Issue number1-3
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Radiation
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging


Dive into the research topics of 'Subjective and objective evaluation of chest imaging systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this