TY - JOUR
T1 - Revisiting area risk classification of visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil
AU - Machado, Gustavo
AU - Alvarez, Julio
AU - Bakka, Haakon Christopher
AU - Perez, Andres
AU - Donato, Lucas Edel
AU - de Ferreira Lima Júnior, Francisco Edilson
AU - Alves, Renato Vieira
AU - Del Rio Vilas, Victor Javier
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01
Acknowledgements: Acknowledgements: We would like to thank Serviço de Vigilância em Saúde, Ministério da Saúde (SVS-MOH), Brasília, Brazil. Funding: This study was funded by the Academic Health Center Faculty Research Development Grant Program (FRD #16.36) and CVM-Department of Population Health and Pathobiology- North Carolina State University, Grant/Award Number: Startup fund. The funder had no role in the collation of the data, development of the conceptual framework, analysis of data, interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.
PY - 2019/1/3
Y1 - 2019/1/3
N2 - BACKGROUND:Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a neglected tropical disease of public health relevance in Brazil. To prioritize disease control measures, the Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde of Brazil's Ministry of Health (SVS/MH) uses retrospective human case counts from VL surveillance data to inform a municipality-based risk classification. In this study, we compared the underlying VL risk, using a spatiotemporal explicit Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM), with the risk classification currently in use by the Brazil's Ministry of Health. We aim to assess how well the current risk classes capture the underlying VL risk as modelled by the BHM.
METHODS:Annual counts of human VL cases and the population at risk for all Brazil's 5564 municipalities between 2004 and 2014 were used to fit a relative risk BHM. We then computed the predicted counts and exceedence risk for each municipality and classified them into four categories to allow comparison with the four risk categories by the SVS/MH. RESULTS:Municipalities identified as high-risk by the model partially agreed with the current risk classification by the SVS/MH. Our results suggest that counts of VL cases may suffice as general indicators of the underlying risk, but can underestimate risks, especially in areas with intense transmission.
CONCLUSION:According to our BHM the SVS/MH risk classification underestimated the risk in several municipalities with moderate to intense VL transmission. Newly identified high-risk areas should be further evaluated to identify potential risk factors and assess the needs for additional surveillance and mitigation efforts.
AB - BACKGROUND:Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a neglected tropical disease of public health relevance in Brazil. To prioritize disease control measures, the Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde of Brazil's Ministry of Health (SVS/MH) uses retrospective human case counts from VL surveillance data to inform a municipality-based risk classification. In this study, we compared the underlying VL risk, using a spatiotemporal explicit Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM), with the risk classification currently in use by the Brazil's Ministry of Health. We aim to assess how well the current risk classes capture the underlying VL risk as modelled by the BHM.
METHODS:Annual counts of human VL cases and the population at risk for all Brazil's 5564 municipalities between 2004 and 2014 were used to fit a relative risk BHM. We then computed the predicted counts and exceedence risk for each municipality and classified them into four categories to allow comparison with the four risk categories by the SVS/MH. RESULTS:Municipalities identified as high-risk by the model partially agreed with the current risk classification by the SVS/MH. Our results suggest that counts of VL cases may suffice as general indicators of the underlying risk, but can underestimate risks, especially in areas with intense transmission.
CONCLUSION:According to our BHM the SVS/MH risk classification underestimated the risk in several municipalities with moderate to intense VL transmission. Newly identified high-risk areas should be further evaluated to identify potential risk factors and assess the needs for additional surveillance and mitigation efforts.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/630781
UR - https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-018-3564-0
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059495326&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12879-018-3564-0
DO - 10.1186/s12879-018-3564-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 30606104
SN - 1471-2334
VL - 19
JO - BMC Infectious Diseases
JF - BMC Infectious Diseases
IS - 1
ER -