Abstract
This paper studies the shape parameters of looped field lines in a linear force-free magnetic field. Loop structures with a sufficient amount of kinking are generally seen to form S or inverse S (Z) shapes in the corona (as viewed in projection). For a single field line, we can ask how much the field line is kinked (as measured by the writhe), and how much neighbouring flux twists about the line (as measured by the twist number). The magnetic helicity of a flux element surrounding the field line can be decomposed into these two quantities. We find that the twist helicity contribution dominates the writhe helicity contribution, for field lines of significant aspect ratio, even when their structure is highly kinked. These calculations shed light on some popular assumptions of the field. First, we show that the writhe of field lines of significant aspect ratio (the apex height divided by the footpoint width) can sometimes be of opposite sign to the helicity. Secondly, we demonstrate the possibility of field line structures which could be interpreted as Z-shaped, but which have a helicity value sign expected of an S-shaped structure. These results suggest that caution should be exercised in using two-dimensional images to draw conclusions on the helicity value of field lines and flux tubes. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 323-345 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Solar Physics |
Volume | 278 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2 2012 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01Acknowledged KAUST grant number(s): KUK-C1-013-04
Acknowledgements: C.P. wishes to thanks John Brooke for his comments and observations on the manuscript. C.P. was supported by the EPSRC and Award No. KUK-C1-013-04 made by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). M.B. was partially supported by an STFC grant and a Leverhulme grant.
This publication acknowledges KAUST support, but has no KAUST affiliated authors.