TY - GEN
T1 - On the Discrepancy between the Theoretical Analysis and Practical Implementations of Compressed Communication for Distributed Deep Learning
AU - Dutta, Aritra
AU - Bergou, El Houcine
AU - Abdelmoniem, Ahmed M.
AU - Ho, Chen-Yu
AU - Sahu, Atal Narayan
AU - Canini, Marco
AU - Kalnis, Panos
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01
PY - 2020/4/3
Y1 - 2020/4/3
N2 - Compressed communication, in the form of sparsification or quantization of stochastic gradients, is employed to reduce communication costs in distributed data-parallel training of deep neural networks. However, there exists a discrepancy between theory and practice: while theoretical analysis of most existing compression methods assumes compression is applied to the gradients of the entire model, many practical implementations operate individually on the gradients of each layer of the model.In this paper, we prove that layer-wise compression is, in theory, better, because the convergence rate is upper bounded by that of entire-model compression for a wide range of biased and unbiased compression methods. However, despite the theoretical bound, our experimental study of six well-known methods shows that convergence, in practice, may or may not be better, depending on the actual trained model and compression ratio. Our findings suggest that it would be advantageous for deep learning frameworks to include support for both layer-wise and entire-model compression.
AB - Compressed communication, in the form of sparsification or quantization of stochastic gradients, is employed to reduce communication costs in distributed data-parallel training of deep neural networks. However, there exists a discrepancy between theory and practice: while theoretical analysis of most existing compression methods assumes compression is applied to the gradients of the entire model, many practical implementations operate individually on the gradients of each layer of the model.In this paper, we prove that layer-wise compression is, in theory, better, because the convergence rate is upper bounded by that of entire-model compression for a wide range of biased and unbiased compression methods. However, despite the theoretical bound, our experimental study of six well-known methods shows that convergence, in practice, may or may not be better, depending on the actual trained model and compression ratio. Our findings suggest that it would be advantageous for deep learning frameworks to include support for both layer-wise and entire-model compression.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/660127
UR - https://aaai.org/ojs/index.php/AAAI/article/view/5793
U2 - 10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5793
DO - 10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5793
M3 - Conference contribution
SP - 3817
EP - 3824
BT - Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
PB - Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)
ER -