TY - JOUR
T1 - Facilitation in plant communities
T2 - The past, the present, and the future
AU - Brooker, Rob W.
AU - Maestre, Fernando T.
AU - Callaway, Ragan M.
AU - Lortie, Christopher L.
AU - Cavieres, Lohengrin A.
AU - Kunstler, Georges
AU - Liancourt, Pierre
AU - Tielbörger, Katja
AU - Travis, Justin M.J.
AU - Anthelme, Fabien
AU - Armas, Cristina
AU - Coll, Lluis
AU - Corcket, Emmanuel
AU - Delzon, Sylvain
AU - Forey, Estelle
AU - Kikvidze, Zaal
AU - Olofsson, Johan
AU - Pugnaire, Francisco
AU - Quiroz, Constanza L.
AU - Saccone, Patrick
AU - Schiffers, Katja
AU - Seifan, Merav
AU - Touzard, Blaize
AU - Michalet, Richard
PY - 2008/1
Y1 - 2008/1
N2 - 1. Once neglected, the role of facilitative interactions in plant communities has received considerable attention in the last two decades, and is now widely recognized. It is timely to consider the progress made by research in this field. 2. We review the development of plant facilitation research, focusing on the history of the field, the relationship between plant-plant interactions and environmental severity gradients, and attempts to integrate facilitation into mainstream ecological theory. We then consider future directions for facilitation research. 3. With respect to our fundamental understanding of plant facilitation, clarification of the relationship between interactions and environmental gradients is central for further progress, and necessitates the design and implementation of experiments that move beyond the clear limitations of previous studies. 4. There is substantial scope for exploring indirect facilitative effects in plant communities, including their impacts on diversity and evolution, and future studies should connect the degree of non-transitivity in plant competitive networks to community diversity and facilitative promotion of species coexistence, and explore how the role of indirect facilitation varies with environmental severity. 5. Certain ecological modelling approaches (e.g. individual-based modelling), although thus far largely neglected, provide highly useful tools for exploring these fundamental processes. 6. Evolutionary responses might result from facilitative interactions, and consideration of facilitation might lead to re-assessment of the evolution of plant growth forms. 7. Improved understanding of facilitation processes has direct relevance for the development of tools for ecosystem restoration, and for improving our understanding of the response of plant species and communities to environmental change drivers. 8. Attempts to apply our developing ecological knowledge would benefit from explicit recognition of the potential role of facilitative plant-plant interactions in the design and interpretation of studies from the fields of restoration and global change ecology. 9. Synthesis: Plant facilitation research provides new insights into classic ecological theory and pressing environmental issues. Awareness and understanding of facilitation should be part of the basic ecological knowledge of all plant ecologists.
AB - 1. Once neglected, the role of facilitative interactions in plant communities has received considerable attention in the last two decades, and is now widely recognized. It is timely to consider the progress made by research in this field. 2. We review the development of plant facilitation research, focusing on the history of the field, the relationship between plant-plant interactions and environmental severity gradients, and attempts to integrate facilitation into mainstream ecological theory. We then consider future directions for facilitation research. 3. With respect to our fundamental understanding of plant facilitation, clarification of the relationship between interactions and environmental gradients is central for further progress, and necessitates the design and implementation of experiments that move beyond the clear limitations of previous studies. 4. There is substantial scope for exploring indirect facilitative effects in plant communities, including their impacts on diversity and evolution, and future studies should connect the degree of non-transitivity in plant competitive networks to community diversity and facilitative promotion of species coexistence, and explore how the role of indirect facilitation varies with environmental severity. 5. Certain ecological modelling approaches (e.g. individual-based modelling), although thus far largely neglected, provide highly useful tools for exploring these fundamental processes. 6. Evolutionary responses might result from facilitative interactions, and consideration of facilitation might lead to re-assessment of the evolution of plant growth forms. 7. Improved understanding of facilitation processes has direct relevance for the development of tools for ecosystem restoration, and for improving our understanding of the response of plant species and communities to environmental change drivers. 8. Attempts to apply our developing ecological knowledge would benefit from explicit recognition of the potential role of facilitative plant-plant interactions in the design and interpretation of studies from the fields of restoration and global change ecology. 9. Synthesis: Plant facilitation research provides new insights into classic ecological theory and pressing environmental issues. Awareness and understanding of facilitation should be part of the basic ecological knowledge of all plant ecologists.
KW - Competition
KW - Disturbance
KW - Ecological theory
KW - Environmental change
KW - Environmental gradients
KW - Facilitation
KW - Plant communities
KW - Positive plant interactions
KW - Review
KW - Stress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37149042549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01295.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01295.x
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:37149042549
SN - 0022-0477
VL - 96
SP - 18
EP - 34
JO - Journal of Ecology
JF - Journal of Ecology
IS - 1
ER -