Fabrication-tolerant and CMOS-compatible polarization splitter and rotator based on a compact bent-tapered directional coupler

Humaira Zafar, Mauro Fernandes Pereira, Kenneth Leslie Kennedy, Dalaver H. Anjum

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    11 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    In this paper, we demonstrate a broadband, low-loss, compact, and fabrication-tolerant polarization splitter and rotator (PSR) on a silicon-on-insulator platform. The PSR is based on an asymmetric directional coupler (ADC), which is covered with SiO2 from the top to make it compatible with the standard metal back end of line (BEOL) process. Conventional ADC-based PSRs suffer from stringent fabrication requirements and relatively low bandwidth, while the proposed bent-tapered design is highly insensitive to the fabrication errors (>70 nm tolerance on the coupling gap) with an enlarged bandwidth and a compact footprint of 53 μm × 7 μm. It yields a polarization conversion loss less than 0.7 dB, a transverse electric (TE) insertion loss better than 0.3 dB, an ultra-low crosstalk with the TE extinction better than 30 dB, and the transverse magnetic extinction better than 25 dB, over a 200 nm wavelength range (1.5 μm-1.7 μm), in both ports. At the 1.55 μm wavelength, the calculated ultra-low polarization conversion loss and TE insertion loss are 0.27 dB and 0.08 dB, respectively.
    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)125214
    JournalAIP Advances
    Volume10
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1 2020

    Bibliographical note

    KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-12-23
    Acknowledgements: The authors acknowledge Dr. Sergio Sanchez Martinez from the Khalifa University Research Computing team for his support with the use of the high-performance computing facilities.

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Fabrication-tolerant and CMOS-compatible polarization splitter and rotator based on a compact bent-tapered directional coupler'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this