Abstract
Background: Macroenzymes may cause elevations in serum enzyme activity. Macroenzymes are not common; however their detection is important because they cause diagnostic confusion and therapeutic errors. Methods: We analyzed 2 of the most prevalent macroenzymes in the literature, macro-creatine kinase (macro-CK) and macroamylase, using 2 methods for detection, polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation and ultrafiltration (UF). Enzyme measurements were made using a Roche Modular Analytics P analyzer. Imprecision was assessed using quality control material. We evaluated 125 samples from apparently healthy subjects to establish reference intervals. For macro-CK comparison, 94 samples with activities > 200. U/l were analyzed with both PEG precipitation and UF and compared to electrophoresis. PEG precipitation and UF were compared for macroamylase detection using 130 samples with amylase activities > 110. U/l. Results: UF was more precise and demonstrated narrower reference intervals for both analytes. PEG precipitation and UF were able to detect true cases of macro-CK with overall agreement with electrophoresis of 79.8% and 80.9%, respectively. Both methods detected the same number of 'positive' macroamylase samples; however PEG precipitation resulted in a greater number of 'indeterminate' cases. Conclusion: This is the first report where UF has been shown useful for the detection of both macro-CK and macroamylase. © 2011.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2052-2057 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Clinica Chimica Acta |
Volume | 412 |
Issue number | 23-24 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 20 2011 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Generated from Scopus record by KAUST IRTS on 2023-09-20ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biochemistry
- Clinical Biochemistry
- Biochemistry, medical