TY - JOUR
T1 - COST 732 in practice
T2 - The MUST model evaluation exercise
AU - Di Sabatino, Silvana
AU - Buccolieri, Riccardo
AU - Olesen, Helge R.
AU - Ketzel, Matthias
AU - Berkowicz, Ruwim
AU - Franke, Jörg
AU - Schatzmann, Michael
AU - Schlünzen, K. Heinke
AU - Leitl, Bernd
AU - Britter, Rex
AU - Borrego, Carlos
AU - Costa, Ana Margarida
AU - Castelli, Silvia Trini
AU - Reisin, Tamir G.
AU - Hellsten, Antti
AU - Saloranta, Jarkko
AU - Moussiopoulos, Nicolas
AU - Barmpas, Fotios
AU - Brzozowski, Krzysztof
AU - Goricsán, István
AU - Balczò, Márton
AU - Bartzis, John G.
AU - Efthimiou, George
AU - Santiago, Jose Luis
AU - Martilli, Alberto
AU - Piringer, Martin
AU - Baumann-Stanzer, Kathrin
AU - Hirtl, Marcus
AU - Baklanov, Alexander A.
AU - Nuterman, Roman B.
AU - Starchenko, Alexander V.
PY - 2011/2
Y1 - 2011/2
N2 - The aim of this paper is to describe the use of a general methodology tailored to the evaluation of micro-scale meteorological models applied to flow and dispersion simulations in urban areas. This methodology, developed within COST 732, has been tested through a large modelling exercise involving many groups across Europe. The major test case used is the Mock Urban Setting Test (MUST) experiment representing an idealised urban area. It is emphasised that a full model evaluation is problem-dependent and requires several activities including a statistical validation that requires a careful choice of the metrics for the comparison with measurements.
AB - The aim of this paper is to describe the use of a general methodology tailored to the evaluation of micro-scale meteorological models applied to flow and dispersion simulations in urban areas. This methodology, developed within COST 732, has been tested through a large modelling exercise involving many groups across Europe. The major test case used is the Mock Urban Setting Test (MUST) experiment representing an idealised urban area. It is emphasised that a full model evaluation is problem-dependent and requires several activities including a statistical validation that requires a careful choice of the metrics for the comparison with measurements.
KW - CFD and non-CFD models
KW - COST Action 732
KW - Idealised urban area
KW - Model evaluation
KW - MUST
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984559315&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1504/IJEP.2011.038442
DO - 10.1504/IJEP.2011.038442
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84984559315
SN - 0957-4352
VL - 44
SP - 403
EP - 418
JO - International Journal of Environment and Pollution
JF - International Journal of Environment and Pollution
IS - 1-4
ER -