Abstract
The authors regret that because of the condensed notation in Eq. (21), we failed to keep track of the dependence of the correction term [Formula presented] on the parameters of interest [Formula presented] entering through [Formula presented] in Section 5 and Appendix B. The following equations were incorrect in the original submission; thus, we provide updated versions below. [Formula presented] [Formula presented] Following Eq. (42), we note that [Formula presented] is a constant. However, it depends on [Formula presented] and has the following shape: [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented] This mistake did not significantly influence the numerical results presented in Section 7. Furthermore, the second to last term in Eq. (93) should have been [Formula presented] rather than [Formula presented]. For completeness, we present the corrected versions of the affected Figs. 1–5 and Figs. 7–11. Finally, the dependence on the data [Formula presented] of the approximate posterior in Section 6 should have been made explicit. The updated equations are as follows: [Formula presented] [Formula presented] For the fully updated version of this article, we refer the reader to arXiv:2112.06794. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 115995 |
Journal | Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering |
Volume | 410 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - May 15 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Computational Mechanics
- Mechanics of Materials
- Mechanical Engineering
- General Physics and Astronomy
- Computer Science Applications