Correction to: Variability of dynamic source parameters inferred from kinematic models of past earthquakes [Geophys. J. Int., 196, 3, (2014) (1754-1769)], doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt478

M. Causse; L. A. Dalguer; P. M. Mai

doi:10.1093/gji/ggw371

Correction to: Variability of dynamic source parameters inferred from kinematic models of past earthquakes [Geophys. J. Int., 196, 3, (2014) (1754-1769)], doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt478

M. Causse^*, L. A. Dalguer, P. M. Mai

^*Corresponding author for this work

Earth Science and Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

In the paper 'Variability of dynamic source parameters inferred from kinematic models of past earthquakes', by M. Causse, L.A. Dalguer and P.M. Mai (2014, Geophys. J. Int., 196(3), 1754-1769, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt478), eqs (3), (5) and (6) provide scaling relations for fracture energy G, static stress drop Δσ_S and dynamic stress drop Δσ_d as a function of seismic moment M₀. In the published paper, these equations are incorrectly reproduced, although they are correctly stated in Figs 5(a) and 6, respectively. Eqs (3), (5), and (6) in the main text must be replaced by the following equations: log₁₀(G) = 0.60 log₁₀(M₀) - 10.6 (3) log₁₀(Δσ_S) = 0.16 log₁₀(M₀) - 2.3 (5) log₁₀(Δσ_d) = 0.21 log₁₀(M₀) - 3.0. (6).

Original language	English (US)
Article number	ggw371
Pages (from-to)	1837
Number of pages	1
Journal	Geophysical Journal International
Volume	207
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw371
State	Published - Dec 1 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Authors 2016.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Geophysics
Geochemistry and Petrology

Access to Document

10.1093/gji/ggw371

Cite this

@article{815cccbe2b1a44048209b8bcf849e16b,

title = "Correction to: Variability of dynamic source parameters inferred from kinematic models of past earthquakes [Geophys. J. Int., 196, 3, (2014) (1754-1769)], doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt478",

abstract = "In the paper 'Variability of dynamic source parameters inferred from kinematic models of past earthquakes', by M. Causse, L.A. Dalguer and P.M. Mai (2014, Geophys. J. Int., 196(3), 1754-1769, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt478), eqs (3), (5) and (6) provide scaling relations for fracture energy G, static stress drop ΔσS and dynamic stress drop Δσd as a function of seismic moment M0. In the published paper, these equations are incorrectly reproduced, although they are correctly stated in Figs 5(a) and 6, respectively. Eqs (3), (5), and (6) in the main text must be replaced by the following equations: log10(G) = 0.60 log10(M0) - 10.6 (3) log10(ΔσS) = 0.16 log10(M0) - 2.3 (5) log10(Δσd) = 0.21 log10(M0) - 3.0. (6).",

author = "M. Causse and Dalguer, {L. A.} and Mai, {P. M.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Authors 2016.",

year = "2016",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/gji/ggw371",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "207",

pages = "1837",

journal = "Geophysical Journal International",

issn = "0956-540X",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "3",

}

Correction to: Variability of dynamic source parameters inferred from kinematic models of past earthquakes [Geophys. J. Int., 196, 3, (2014) (1754-1769)], doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt478. / Causse, M.; Dalguer, L. A.; Mai, P. M.
In: Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 207, No. 3, ggw371, 01.12.2016, p. 1837.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to

T2 - Variability of dynamic source parameters inferred from kinematic models of past earthquakes [Geophys. J. Int., 196, 3, (2014) (1754-1769)], doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt478

AU - Causse, M.

AU - Dalguer, L. A.

AU - Mai, P. M.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - In the paper 'Variability of dynamic source parameters inferred from kinematic models of past earthquakes', by M. Causse, L.A. Dalguer and P.M. Mai (2014, Geophys. J. Int., 196(3), 1754-1769, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt478), eqs (3), (5) and (6) provide scaling relations for fracture energy G, static stress drop ΔσS and dynamic stress drop Δσd as a function of seismic moment M0. In the published paper, these equations are incorrectly reproduced, although they are correctly stated in Figs 5(a) and 6, respectively. Eqs (3), (5), and (6) in the main text must be replaced by the following equations: log10(G) = 0.60 log10(M0) - 10.6 (3) log10(ΔσS) = 0.16 log10(M0) - 2.3 (5) log10(Δσd) = 0.21 log10(M0) - 3.0. (6).

AB - In the paper 'Variability of dynamic source parameters inferred from kinematic models of past earthquakes', by M. Causse, L.A. Dalguer and P.M. Mai (2014, Geophys. J. Int., 196(3), 1754-1769, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt478), eqs (3), (5) and (6) provide scaling relations for fracture energy G, static stress drop ΔσS and dynamic stress drop Δσd as a function of seismic moment M0. In the published paper, these equations are incorrectly reproduced, although they are correctly stated in Figs 5(a) and 6, respectively. Eqs (3), (5), and (6) in the main text must be replaced by the following equations: log10(G) = 0.60 log10(M0) - 10.6 (3) log10(ΔσS) = 0.16 log10(M0) - 2.3 (5) log10(Δσd) = 0.21 log10(M0) - 3.0. (6).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006246931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/gji/ggw371

DO - 10.1093/gji/ggw371

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85006246931

SN - 0956-540X

VL - 207

SP - 1837

JO - Geophysical Journal International

JF - Geophysical Journal International

IS - 3

M1 - ggw371

ER -

Correction to: Variability of dynamic source parameters inferred from kinematic models of past earthquakes [Geophys. J. Int., 196, 3, (2014) (1754-1769)], doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt478

Abstract

Bibliographical note

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this