Coordination of one- and two-joint muscles during voluntary movement: theoretical and experimental considerations.

W. Herzog*, R. Ait-Haddou

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

The target article by Dr. Prilutsky is based on three incorrectly derived mathematical rules concerning force-sharing among synergistic muscles associated with a cost function that minimizes the sum of the cubed muscle stresses. Since these derived rules govern all aspects of Dr. Prilutsky's discussion and conclusion and form the basis for his proposed theory of coordination between one-and two-joint muscles, most of what is said in the target article is confusing or misleading at best or factually wrong at worst. The aim of our commentary is to sort right from wrong in Dr. Prilutsky's article within space limitations that do not allow for detailed descriptions of mathematical proofs and explicit discussions of the relevant experimental literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-74; discussion 97-74116
JournalMotor control
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2000
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coordination of one- and two-joint muscles during voluntary movement: theoretical and experimental considerations.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this