Abstract
Based on data from field trials with a large collection of 135 elite winter wheat inbred lines and 1604 F 1 hybrids derived from them, we compared the accuracy of prediction of marker-assisted selection and current genomic selection approaches for the model traits heading time and plant height in a cross-validation approach. For heading time, the high accuracy seen with marker-assisted selection severely dropped with genomic selection approaches RR-BLUP (ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction) and BayesCπ, whereas for plant height, accuracy was low with marker-assisted selection as well as RR-BLUP and BayesCπ. Differences in the linkage disequilibrium structure of the functional and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers relevant for the two traits were identified in a simulation study as a likely explanation for the different trends in accuracies of prediction. A new genomic selection approach, weighted best linear unbiased prediction (W-BLUP), designed to treat the effects of known functional markers more appropriately, proved to increase the accuracy of prediction for both traits and thus closes the gap between marker-assisted and genomic selection.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 638-645 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Heredity |
Volume | 112 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We thank Andreas Börner for critical comments on the manuscript. This research was conducted within the HYWHEAT project funded by BMBF (Grant ID: FKZ0315945D).
Keywords
- genomic selection
- heading time
- hybrid wheat
- marker-assisted selection
- plant height
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Genetics
- Genetics(clinical)