Abstract
Apportionment methods are used to round the vote proportions of parties in a proportional representation system to integer numbers of seats in the parliament. Seat biases quantify by how much on average a particular apportionment method favors larger (or smaller) parties. In this paper, we prove a previous conjecture on asymptotic seat biases of stationary divisor methods and the quota method of greatest remainders, as the size of the parliament tends to infinity.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 23-31 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Metrika |
Volume | 62 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2005 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Apportionment methods
- Hamilton
- Hare
- Jefferson
- Rounding methods
- Sainte-Laguë
- Webster
- d'Hondt
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Statistics and Probability
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty