Abstract
A comparison has been made between the antisolvent crystallization of NaCl with diisopropylamine and the traditional four-effect evaporative crystallization of NaCl. Calculations demonstrated that for a 1 Mton/year salt production plant with an on-site integrated steam power plant the reduction in energy costs can be 29% if antisolvent crystallization is applied. The estimated fixed capital costs, however, are 8-55% higher for the antisolvent crystallization of NaCl, depending on the process configuration used. As a result of the higher fixed capital costs, the costs in the production of NaCl are lower for the four-effect evaporative crystallization route in all cases.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1330-1337 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2000 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Chemistry
- General Chemical Engineering
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering