Abstract
Animal-attached devices have transformed our understanding of vertebrate ecology. To minimize any associated harm, researchers have long advocated that tag masses should not exceed 3% of carrier body mass. However, this ignores tag forces resulting from animal movement. Using data from collar-attached accelerometers on 10 diverse free-ranging terrestrial species from koalas to cheetahs, we detail a tag-based acceleration method to clarify acceptable tag mass limits. We quantify animal athleticism in terms of fractions of animal movement time devoted to different collar-recorded accelerations and convert those accelerations to forces (acceleration × tag mass) to allow derivation of any defined force limits for specified fractions of any animal's active time. Specifying that tags should exert forces that are less than 3% of the gravitational force exerted on the animal's body for 95% of the time led to corrected tag masses that should constitute between 1.6% and 2.98% of carrier mass, depending on athleticism. Strikingly, in four carnivore species encompassing two orders of magnitude in mass (ca 2–200 kg), forces exerted by ‘3%' tags were equivalent to 4–19% of carrier body mass during moving, with a maximum of 54% in a hunting cheetah. This fundamentally changes how acceptable tag mass limits should be determined by ethics bodies, irrespective of the force and time limits specified.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Journal | Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |
Volume | 288 |
Issue number | 1961 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 27 2021 |
Bibliographical note
KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2021-11-01Acknowledged KAUST grant number(s): KAUST Sensor Initiative
Acknowledgements: This work benefitted by funding from: the CAASE project (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)) under the KAUST Sensor Initiative (R.P.W., R.G., M.H., C.M.D.); the Royal Society/Wolfson Laboratory refurbishment scheme (R.P.W.); the Department of Learning and the Challenge Funding, and access provided by the National Trust and Forest Service NI (D.M.S., J.P.T.); the Vice Deanship of Research Chairs at the King Saud University, Saudi Arabia (A.A., D.M.S., N.C.B.); The Royal Society 2009/R3 JP090604 (D.M.S.); Natural Environment Research Council NE/I002030/1 (D.M.S.); the Department for Economy Global Challenges Research Fund (D.M.S.); the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (DARD) Northern Ireland (currently the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs) through various studentships (D.M.S., N.J.M.); the Department for the Economy studentship to J.P.T. (D.M.S., N.J.M.); the National Science Foundation IIS-1514174, IOS-1250895 (M.C.C.); the Packard Foundation Fellowship 2016-65130 (M.C.C.); the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation in the framework of the Alexander von Humboldt Professorship endowed by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (M.C.C.); Deakin University, the advanced research supporting the forestry and wood-processing sector's adaptation to global change and EVA4.0, no. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000803 financed by OP RDE and supported by grant QK1910462.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
- General Environmental Science
- General Immunology and Microbiology
- General Medicine