Analysis of robust H2 performance: Comparisons and examples

Fernando Paganini; Eric Feron

Analysis of robust H2 performance: Comparisons and examples

Fernando Paganini, Eric Feron

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

This paper discusses the comparison between the two main approaches for analyzing H2 performance in the worst case over system uncertainty. One method takes the system impulse response as a starting point for the H2 criterion, the other focuses on stationary noise rejection with a deterministic interpretation. The paper reviews these methods and provides both theoretical and numerical comparisons between them.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
Publisher	IEEEPiscataway, NJ, United States
Pages	1000-1005
Number of pages	6
State	Published - Dec 1 1997
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Generated from Scopus record by KAUST IRTS on 2021-02-18

Cite this

@inproceedings{3ace6c1674594eb68b5652cc65e44132,

title = "Analysis of robust H2 performance: Comparisons and examples",

abstract = "This paper discusses the comparison between the two main approaches for analyzing H2 performance in the worst case over system uncertainty. One method takes the system impulse response as a starting point for the H2 criterion, the other focuses on stationary noise rejection with a deterministic interpretation. The paper reviews these methods and provides both theoretical and numerical comparisons between them.",

author = "Fernando Paganini and Eric Feron",

note = "Generated from Scopus record by KAUST IRTS on 2021-02-18",

year = "1997",

month = dec,

day = "1",

language = "English (US)",

pages = "1000--1005",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control",

publisher = "IEEEPiscataway, NJ, United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Analysis of robust H2 performance: Comparisons and examples

AU - Paganini, Fernando

AU - Feron, Eric

N1 - Generated from Scopus record by KAUST IRTS on 2021-02-18

PY - 1997/12/1

Y1 - 1997/12/1

N2 - This paper discusses the comparison between the two main approaches for analyzing H2 performance in the worst case over system uncertainty. One method takes the system impulse response as a starting point for the H2 criterion, the other focuses on stationary noise rejection with a deterministic interpretation. The paper reviews these methods and provides both theoretical and numerical comparisons between them.

AB - This paper discusses the comparison between the two main approaches for analyzing H2 performance in the worst case over system uncertainty. One method takes the system impulse response as a starting point for the H2 criterion, the other focuses on stationary noise rejection with a deterministic interpretation. The paper reviews these methods and provides both theoretical and numerical comparisons between them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031344297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 1000

EP - 1005

BT - Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control

PB - IEEEPiscataway, NJ, United States

ER -

Analysis of robust H2 performance: Comparisons and examples

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this