A theoretical comparison among model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods

Gerard T. Schuster; Min Zhou

doi:10.1190/1.2148198

A theoretical comparison among model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods

Gerard T. Schuster^*, Min Zhou

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

Abstract

Model-based redatuming and correlation-based redatuming methods are theoretically compared to one another. A correlation-based redatuming method uses natural phase information in the data to time shift the weighted traces so that they appear to be generated by sources (or recorded by geophones) shifted in location. In this paper, we show that all of the redatuming methods are based on a common formula. From this formula, we can assess the relative weaknesses and strengths of each method.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005
Publisher	Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Pages	2374-2377
Number of pages	4
ISBN (Print)	9781604236101
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2148198
State	Published - 2005
Externally published	Yes
Event	75th Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005 - Houston, United States Duration: Nov 6 2005 → Nov 11 2005

Publication series

Name	Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005

Conference

Conference	75th Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005
Country/Territory	United States
City	Houston
Period	11/6/05 → 11/11/05

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005. All rights reserved.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Geophysics

Access to Document

10.1190/1.2148198

Cite this

Schuster, G. T., & Zhou, M. (2005). A theoretical comparison among model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods. In Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005 (pp. 2374-2377). (Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005). Society of Exploration Geophysicists. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2148198

Schuster, Gerard T. ; Zhou, Min. / A theoretical comparison among model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods. Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2005. pp. 2374-2377 (Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005).

@inproceedings{2eb818b47ca74e06a0458ffccfe03434,

title = "A theoretical comparison among model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods",

abstract = "Model-based redatuming and correlation-based redatuming methods are theoretically compared to one another. A correlation-based redatuming method uses natural phase information in the data to time shift the weighted traces so that they appear to be generated by sources (or recorded by geophones) shifted in location. In this paper, we show that all of the redatuming methods are based on a common formula. From this formula, we can assess the relative weaknesses and strengths of each method.",

author = "Schuster, {Gerard T.} and Min Zhou",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005. All rights reserved.; 75th Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005 ; Conference date: 06-11-2005 Through 11-11-2005",

year = "2005",

doi = "10.1190/1.2148198",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9781604236101",

series = "Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005",

publisher = "Society of Exploration Geophysicists",

pages = "2374--2377",

booktitle = "Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005",

}

Schuster, GT & Zhou, M 2005, A theoretical comparison among model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods. in Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005. Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 2374-2377, 75th Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005, Houston, United States, 11/6/05. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2148198

A theoretical comparison among model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods. / Schuster, Gerard T.; Zhou, Min.
Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2005. p. 2374-2377 (Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - A theoretical comparison among model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods

AU - Schuster, Gerard T.

AU - Zhou, Min

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Model-based redatuming and correlation-based redatuming methods are theoretically compared to one another. A correlation-based redatuming method uses natural phase information in the data to time shift the weighted traces so that they appear to be generated by sources (or recorded by geophones) shifted in location. In this paper, we show that all of the redatuming methods are based on a common formula. From this formula, we can assess the relative weaknesses and strengths of each method.

AB - Model-based redatuming and correlation-based redatuming methods are theoretically compared to one another. A correlation-based redatuming method uses natural phase information in the data to time shift the weighted traces so that they appear to be generated by sources (or recorded by geophones) shifted in location. In this paper, we show that all of the redatuming methods are based on a common formula. From this formula, we can assess the relative weaknesses and strengths of each method.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055867050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1190/1.2148198

DO - 10.1190/1.2148198

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85055867050

SN - 9781604236101

T3 - Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005

SP - 2374

EP - 2377

BT - Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005

PB - Society of Exploration Geophysicists

T2 - 75th Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005

Y2 - 6 November 2005 through 11 November 2005

ER -

Schuster GT, Zhou M. A theoretical comparison among model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods. In Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. 2005. p. 2374-2377. (Society of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005). doi: 10.1190/1.2148198

A theoretical comparison among model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Bibliographical note

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this