A left bundle branch block activation sequence and ventricular pacing influence voltage amplitudes: An in vivo and in silico study

Uyên Châu Nguyên*, Mark Potse, Kevin Vernooy, Masih Mafi-Rad, Jordi Heijman, Maria Luce Caputo, Giulio Conte, François Regoli, Rolf Krause, Tiziano Moccetti, Angelo Auricchio, Frits W. Prinzen, Francesco Maffessanti

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the activation sequence on voltage amplitudes by evaluating regional voltage differences during a left bundle branch block (LBBB) activation sequence vs. a normal synchronous activation sequence and by evaluating pacing-induced voltage differences. Methods and results Twenty-one patients and three computer models without scar were studied. Regional voltage amplitudes were evaluated in nine LBBB patients who underwent endocardial electro-anatomic mapping (EAM). Pacing-induced voltage differences were evaluated in 12 patients who underwent epicardial EAM during intrinsic rhythm and right ventricular (RV) pacing. Three computer models customized for LBBB patients were created. Changes in voltage amplitudes after an LBBB (intrinsic), a normal synchronous, an RV pacing, and a left ventricular pacing activation sequence were assessed in the computer models. Unipolar voltage amplitudes in patients were approximately 4.5mV (4.4-4.7 mV, ~33%) lower in the septum when compared with other segments. A normal synchronous activation sequence in the computer models normalized voltage amplitudes in the septum. Pacing-induced differences were larger in electrograms with higher voltage amplitudes during intrinsic rhythm and furthermore larger and more variable at the epicardium [mean absolute difference: 3.6-6.2 mV, 40-53% of intrinsic value; interquartile range (IQR) differences: 53-63% of intrinsic value] compared to the endocardium (mean absolute difference: 3.3-3.8 mV, 28- 30% of intrinsic value; IQR differences: 37-40% of intrinsic value). Conclusion In patients and computer models without scar, lower septal unipolar voltage amplitudes are exclusively associated with an LBBB activation sequence. Pacing substantially affects voltage amplitudes, particularly at the epicardium.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)III77-III86
JournalEuropace
Volume20
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018.

Keywords

  • Activation sequence
  • Anisotropy
  • Computer models
  • Heart failure
  • Intra-cardiac electrogram
  • Left bundle branch block
  • Voltage amplitude

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A left bundle branch block activation sequence and ventricular pacing influence voltage amplitudes: An in vivo and in silico study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this